Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:12:18 -0400
From: Jon LaBadie <jcyg@jgcomp.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: @file handling in Cygwin
Message-ID: <20020814221218.GA29230@butch.jgcomp.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Jon LaBadie <jcyg@jgcomp.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <762C0A863A7674478671627FEAF584812C3578@hqmail01.powertv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <762C0A863A7674478671627FEAF584812C3578@hqmail01.powertv.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:01:55PM -0700, Cheng, Cheuk wrote:
> Thanks all for their comments.  Using ls -@lsflags will give "ls:
> invalid option -- @" instead.  I also know of cat and xargs but I just
> want to check whether @file is supported _within_ Cygwin or not.

Where is it supported?  I've never seen it?

Is it an "os" or "shell" feature so that it is not "ls" specific?

Otherwise I'd think an ls(1) man page perusal would answer
the question negatively.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jcyg@jgcomp.com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

