Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3D50BF6F.9020101@colorfullife.com> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 08:34:23 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nils CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] cygwin+bash: bash reorders script output bug identified/fixed References: <3D4F758C.4010109@colorfullife.com> <3D509328.3040302@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nils wrote: > This may have been what I was running into as well. See > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01894.html > > When doing the same compiles with in a window with tcsh running (even > if bash gets invoked later on) the process numbers seem to increase > much more slowly. If you do a large compile using bash as your shell, > do you see process numbers creeping upward (in task manager) gradually > as well? That sounds like either windows or cygwin is leaking handles. Get handleex from sysinternals (google finds it) and check if there is an unusal amount of open handles around, and which process owns them. -- Manfred -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/