Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Oops? From: Robert Collins To: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Qukj+u0t8lb2cUoULvl0" Date: 05 Aug 2002 12:04:29 +1000 Message-Id: <1028513075.8966.178.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-Qukj+u0t8lb2cUoULvl0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 11:58, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > It's a question for the packagers whether the dll version should be > consistent with the package version. It's not a question. The dll version is orthogonal to the package version. Rob --=-Qukj+u0t8lb2cUoULvl0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1N3SwACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoI9mACgzXGwMZly49Bnqm2yg+iFnOeR a8MAoLccw4RVYRw31PyaF74Xa/KmL2iM =kDAC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Qukj+u0t8lb2cUoULvl0--