Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:30:59 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Oops? Message-ID: <20020804153059.GA1159@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020803163839.01f9a9d0@pop3.cris.com> <3D4C64D5.22202.6B6DA6F@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D4C64D5.22202.6B6DA6F@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 11:18:45PM -0700, Stephen C. Biggs wrote: >I'm not trying to flame you here, please don't get me wrong. At the >very least, the DLL is the same as was before. You DID say that you >had packaged an obsolete version of the DLL before; is it possible you >did it again? Just want to be sure about this. No one seemed to complain that 1.3.12-2 reported a cygwin-1-3-12-1 CVS tag. It's apparently a big deal now, though. This is the last time I'm going to say it: The DLL that is available in cygwin-1.3.12-4 is correct. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/