Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 07:37:20 -0400 From: Jason Tishler Subject: Re: FAQ or bash bug with ntsec? (WAS: Help request: bash with PAT H problems) In-reply-to: <20020730125100.D3921@cygbert.vinschen.de> To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-followup-to: cygwin@cygwin.com Message-id: <20020730113720.GB1916@tishler.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i References: <1264BCF4F426D611B0B00050DA782A50027EFF9F@mail.gft.com> <20020730125100.D3921@cygbert.vinschen.de> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > What I don't understand, though, is, why the permissions are set to > that value by setup.exe. I thought it should give explicitely full > permissions to world. At least I recall that I added some code to > setup.exe setting the security descriptor. Is it not used in setup > anymore??? Someone on the pgsql-cygwin list had the same problem with postgres.exe. After helping him, I ask him to determine why the permissions were only set to "-rwx------". Unfortunately, he never reported back. Could it be that users are setting "Install For" to "Just Me"? Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/