Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:18:48 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Odd mount and path problem Message-ID: <20020723201848.GD25780@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B226D@wilber.adroit.com> <00b001c23284$4ba76a50$0400a8c0@JIMGEORGE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00b001c23284$4ba76a50$0400a8c0@JIMGEORGE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 09:05:12PM +0100, Jim George wrote: >I also don't think you do but I've seen mount lists that show things >like /usr/X11R6/bin as a mount point and I don't understand why this is >necessary, especially when /usr is already mounted. Unless X11R6/bin >is on a different drive (logical or physical). Different options for the directory is one possibility, like setting "-X", for instance. Mounting the directory with -X would allow cygwin to assume that everything in the directory was executable, speeding up processing somewhat. cgf -- Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions. Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/