Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <3D3AC767.4090907@gmx.li>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:38:31 -0400
From: Shawn Behrens <sbehrens@gmx.li>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: news: cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: cygwin 3.11 stable for WinXP?
References: <OE290KAO6gxysfr1Tb000004f0d@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

>is cygwin 3.11 or any other version stable enough for Windows XP PRO?
>
The current version is plenty stable. It depends on what you wish to do, 
though. The packages you intend to use. Beta packages are, obviously, in 
beta stage. We use Cygwin with sshd in a production environment to get 
remote shell access to Windows machines, and yes, it has made life a lot 
easier.

Shawn



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/