Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:52:51 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Toplevel configury of src Message-ID: <20020713165251.GA30143@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20020709183342.GA18151@doctormoo.dyndns.org> <0b2701c227a1$0fc34ab0$2300a8c0@LAPTOP> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b2701c227a1$0fc34ab0$2300a8c0@LAPTOP> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:33:42AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> Should it mean "Don't build or use the newlib in the tree; use installed >> libs and headers, or the ones specified with --with-libs and >> --with-headers"? >> >> Should it be illegal, and give an error message? > >Chris is probably the person with the canonical answer. However, "illegal >and an error", or "illegal, warn, and build newlib anyway" both make sense >to me. I answered this in the gcc mailing list, but I agree with Robert. Either of the above is fine. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/