Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Originating-IP: [202.7.175.32] From: "Gareth Pearce" To: References: <3D2C4C1F.8010002@ece.gatech.edu> <20020710161833.36437.qmail@web21004.mail.yahoo.com> <3D2C7077.6040204@ece.gatech.edu> Subject: Re: gcc2-2.95.3-7 uploaded Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:25:22 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2002 01:25:21.0406 (UTC) FILETIME=[D2E349E0:01C22879] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Wilson" Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin To: Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:35 AM Subject: Re: gcc2-2.95.3-7 uploaded > > > Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > > --- Charles Wilson wrote: > > > >>(*) cygwin itself is the only other C++ DLL -- but all of its exports > >>are non-mangled... > >> > > > > Are you forgetting about the db3.x/db4.x c++ api? I'm revving up to > > release v3 next week, but I need to know if this will cause it problems. > > > They aren't "out" yet. So I didn't mention them. If one or both are > released before gcc-3.1.1 becomes official, then yes, they should also > be added to the "Maybe a c++ ABI problem" list. > My worthless 2 cents - since the default compiler is going to be 3.1.1, all nesecery packages should be recompiled for it. If compiler was going to be named g++-3 or similar, then maybe there would be a question. Gareth -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/