Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <3D29AFD6.4050304@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 11:29:26 -0400
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-1, gcc2-2.95.3-6, and gcc-mingw-3_1-20020516-1
References: <20020707032010.GA22463@redhat.com> <3D28FCF6.40808@ece.gatech.edu> <20020708031758.GC2440@redhat.com> <3D2911C5.8010909@ece.gatech.edu> <20020708052729.GA27657@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I don't see exactly the same errors.  I can't even compile your stuff
> with g++.  :-( It appears to be due to --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs,
> AFAICT.


Right -- I had to change #include <iostream.h> to <iostream>, etc.  I'm 
not real familiar with the source-level changes that gcc-3.x *forces* 
onto people -- but I'm not real happy about them.  The price of 
progress, I suppose.

Does anybody know of a good reference, along the lines of "What changed 
in g++ between gcc-2.95.3 and gcc-3.x"?  I'm not talking about the 
innards of gcc; but rather, user-visible changes that force me to change 
my perfectly good 2.95.3 C++ code so that it'll compile with g++ 3.x.

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/