Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 12:50:39 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: binutils-20020706-1 Message-ID: <20020706165039.GC30296@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20020706060443.1576A1C355@redhat.com> <20020706105628.51502.qmail@web21001.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020706105628.51502.qmail@web21001.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:56:28AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >Just out of curiosity, what's the difference between binutils-20020629 and >binutils-20020630? Why would the former work fine with gcc-2 and the >latter not? I thought you had changed the alignment in binutils-20020629 >to accomodate java? Nope. No special alignment in 20020629. That was the reason for 20020630. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/