Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 00:23:28 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: /proc/uptime etc. - NtQuerySystemInformation() needs bigger structure Message-ID: <20020706042328.GA17865@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <004f01c22449$91da71a0$0100a8c0@advent02> <20020705200207.GA11696@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 01:44:21PM +0930, Trevor Forbes wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" >> This is one thing that was fixed by the -fnative-struct gcc option which >> is, unfortunately, not available in gcc 3.1. > >Yes, but I thought that the -fnative-struct functionality moved >to -mms-bitfields in gcc 3.1? Is this correct? Sort of. There are still some missing bits, if some older mail from Danny on this subject is correct. I thought I just saw someone talking about implementing the functionality on the gcc trunk, too. Don't know what that's all about. In any event, this was a red herring. This wasn't the actual problem. Compiling things with -malign-double seems to fix the problem. I've regenned my gcc 3.1 compiler so that this is the default. Thanks to Danny Smith for setting me on the right track, here. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/