Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 01:15:38 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: SUBJECT .... Message-ID: <20020703051538.GB20393@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <200207030304.UAA04295@sumeru.stanford.EDU> <200207030304.UAA04295@sumeru.stanford.EDU> <5.1.0.14.2.20020702203255.02643eb0@pop3.cris.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020702203255.02643eb0@pop3.cris.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:37:57PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote: >Chris, > >Whew! Thanks for that unequivocal reply. > >There's nothing worse (in the world of mailing lists) that such a hideous >sop to brain-dead mailers. > >This makes me suspect that we're about due for the counterpart to the >request for a [LIST-NAME] "Subject:" tag: having "Reply-To:" set by the >list server. We're actually suffering from a bout of this internally. All of our internal mailing lists have been revamped and all of them now have the detested [BLEURGH] subject prefix. I've been spending a lot of time eradicating it there, too. >Perhaps that one should be put to rest, right away, too? Reply-To? Not no way, not no how. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/