Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:53:13 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.3.11: accept ist not interrupted by a signal
Message-ID: <20020628145313.GC4490@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0206281405210.269-100000@algeria.intern.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0206281405210.269-100000@algeria.intern.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:34:16PM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
>I am a bit confused about the current signal handling in a blocking
>accept call (i have not checked other system calls yet)
>If the process is blocked it is not interrupted by a signal.

Yep, unfortunately that's how it works currently.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

