Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:03:56 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Executing commands is VERY slow when logged into an NT domain.... Message-ID: <20020627150356.GD5126@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20020626141435.GC28356@redhat.com> <20020627053619.13441.qmail@web10508.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020627053619.13441.qmail@web10508.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:36:19PM -0700, Rick Rankin wrote: > >--- Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Out of curiousity, does mounting your /bin and /usr/bin directories with the >> -X >> option "fix" anything? >> >> mount -f -b -X c:/cygwin/bin /bin >> mount -f -b -X c:/cygwin/bin /usr/bin >> >> where c:\cygwin is the location of your root, of course. > >It turns out that the -X option does help quite a bit. Here are some rough >results based on using a stopwatch to time the interval from when I >double-click the bash icon on my desktop until I see a prompt: > >20020626 snapshot, no -X: 25.2 sec >20020626 snapshot, with -X: 6.7 sec >1.3.10-1, no -X: 2.1 sec > >I didn't retry the 0625 snapshot, but it ran about the same speed without the >-X option. > >Does that narrow things down any? Some, but it is still mystifying. I would have expected -X to actually completely mask the problem. There are some more changes in CVS. I'll regen a snapshot as soon as Corinna checks in her latest change. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/