Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:45:20 +1200 From: Danny Smith Subject: Re [2]: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot cause page fault in kernel32.dl To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com Reply-to: Danny Smith Message-id: <002001c21a57$a2acb660$ac91a7cb@DANNY> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Smith" To: Sent: Sunday, 23 June 2002 13:42 Subject: Re: cygwin1.dll [1.3.11(CVS)]: Changes since 06/19 snapshot cause page fault in kernel32.dl Ooops This may be culprit: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2002-06/msg00130.html Danny > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 06:46:29PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > >PT>> 3) The new binutils has something to do with the crash > > > >I've found the following: > > > > Old 'ld'(200110) seems to place the following symbols and the first > > '.data_cygwin_nocopy' on a the same place - '_data_end__' and > > 'wsock_started'. > > > > New 'ld' places them in the following order: > > 1. '_data_end__' > > 2. first '.data_cygwin_nocopy' section and 'wsock_started' starting > > 4 bytes after '_data_end__'. > > > >Of course it may have nothing to do with the crash - if so just tell me > >and I'll shut up :) > > That's actually an interesting observation. Thanks. > > I can confirm that the test version of binutils is doing something > funky. I've removed that version from sourceware -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/