Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com From: "Robert Collins" To: , Subject: RE: New setup.exe v.2.249.2.2 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:01:17 +1000 Message-ID: <008901c211f8$184c9970$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <000701c21190$9a301380$af7b1f3e@Fergus> > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com > [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of > fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net > Sent: Wednesday, 12 June 2002 7:40 AM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Cc: fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net > Subject: New setup.exe v.2.249.2.2 > > > Both http://cygwin.com/setup.exe and > http://cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.249.2.2.exe come up with > v.2.249.2.2 as their ID when they are started, but their md5sum's are > different. Is the first-named the later version and therefore > the one to > try? They are the same. The md5 difference is because one has been recompressed with UPX, as part of the release process. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/