Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 17:28:42 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 1.3.11(CVS): Possible bug involving temp file generation Message-ID: <20020606172842.J22789@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20020605132012.8086.qmail@web21002.mail.yahoo.com> <12220356170.20020605154358@syntrex.com> <20020605150849.GF15167@redhat.com> <17118445663.20020606162210@syntrex.com> <20020606165907.F22789@cygbert.vinschen.de> <4221375626.20020606171100@syntrex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4221375626.20020606171100@syntrex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > CV> It's not 0. See autoload.cc. > > I did, but got some hard time groking it :( > > But how do you explain this then (taken from the strace.log attached > by Nicholas Wourms) ? > > ********************************************** > Program name: C:\CYGNUS\CYGWIN\BIN\PATCH.EXE (601141) > App version: 1003.9, api: 0.51 > DLL version: 1003.11, api: 0.53 > DLL build: 2002-06-04 09:27 > OS version: Windows ME-4.90 > Date/Time: 2002-06-04 10:31:36 > ********************************************** > > 2142 57784 [main] PATCH 601141 handle_to_fn: nt name '' > > From what you say and what I can see in the code it look like this > shouldn't be hapenning. He used the version of 2002-06-04 while Chris patched handle_to_fn() on 2002-06-05 ;-) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/