Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 11:08:49 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: 1.3.11(CVS): Possible bug involving temp file generation Message-ID: <20020605150849.GF15167@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20020605132012.8086.qmail@web21002.mail.yahoo.com> <12220356170.20020605154358@syntrex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12220356170.20020605154358@syntrex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:43:58PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: >Check this thread: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-06/msg00158.html > >I've looked at the strace log you've attached and I saw that the code >reached a point which it wasn't supposed to reach under Win9x/ME. > >This is the line from the strace.log - normally this won't be printed >on Win9x: > 2142 57784 [main] PATCH 601141 handle_to_fn: nt name '' > >NW> It worked like a charm :). What was the problem and how did you solve it, >NW> if I might ask? Actually, it is not supposed to make it that far anywhere unless the file is opened from the command line in stdout. I don't know how it could affect temp file generation. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/