Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 22:55:55 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: try try again (waiting for the retraction/correction) Message-ID: <20020601025555.GA29537@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20020528211054.VBYY13408.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@webmail.worldnet.att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020528211054.VBYY13408.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@webmail.worldnet.att.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:10:52PM +0000, perlspinr@att.net wrote: >I need proper information for makefiles to get, and I *am* using uname >to get that info. It's wrong too (I am NOT at that system this pm and >cannot double-triple- check that, but am very close to sure, and if I >was wrong I'll post a retraction/correction about it later, when I've >had a chance to re-check it, if I am not banned from the List by then). Well, you're not banned from the list (I don't ban people for blowing off steam). Since I'm going to be releasing 1.3.11 soon, I'm interested in knowing of potential problems with uname. If you could provide a summary of what's wrong with uname, I'll try to fix it before the next release. If this was just cockpit error, it would be useful to know that too, since you are so adamant about claiming that uname is wrong. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/