Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:41:04 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] gettimeofday time travels Message-ID: <20020508144104.GA1093@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <15547.16136.163472.840007@bea.com> <20020415214133.GA19612@redhat.com> <15577.12319.622365.566799@bea.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15577.12319.622365.566799@bea.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 03:03:11PM +0100, Philip Aston wrote: > >Hi Christopher, > >cgf writes on 15 Apr: > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Philip Aston wrote: > > >How about the attached quick and dirty fix? > > > > I'm sorry but I don't think a quick and dirty fix is justified if > > there are other alternatives. I haven't seen any other alternatives > > discussed yet. > >No other alternatives have been proposed. I'm aware of a couple of >other XEmacs'ers who are plagued by this (we love our uptime). > >I don't believe my patch to be dirtier than the implementation (no >offence intended!). Please reconsider it. Maybe mentioning the word "dirty" a few more times will get your patch in. Keep at it! cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/