Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_J=F6nsson?= To: Subject: Gcc-3.1 and binutils under cygwin [Was: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert]] Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 19:49:20 +0200 Message-ID: <000f01c1f526$5d89f850$0301a8c0@D90V2D0J> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020506174435.GB16574@redhat.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Hello Chris. Gcc-3.1 is coming out pretty well under cygwin. I'd hope for a gcc-3.1.x cygwin package also. Even gcj/libjava/libgcj is coming out well, perhaps in a 3.1.x release but at least pretty good on the trunk. I'd also like to see a newer binutils on cygin once a gcc-3.1 cygwin package is being worked on. Cheers, /ChJ -----Original Message----- From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:45 PM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3-5 inline patch [FAQ alert] On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:25:58PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >Chris, >Would you be willing to accept this patch into the Cygwin gcc source >tree? I'm not going to be issuing any new gcc releases until sometime after 3.1. I guess this needs to be a FAQ or something. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/