Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 17:04:00 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: New snapshot with significant new functionality Message-ID: <20020505210400.GA9778@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020505133943.00b04720@pop3.cris.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020505133943.00b04720@pop3.cris.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:54:37PM -0700, Randall R Schulz wrote: >Chris, Chris, Chris, > >Here are a couple of alternate ideas: > >1) Require a mount to access /proc (or just /proc/registry). From my Thu, 2 May 2002 22:47:31 -0400 mail: >Long term, this kind of stuff should be somehow "mountable". Corinna >and DJ had a plan for doing something like this at one time. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/