Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Originating-IP: [198.142.235.86]
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps@hotmail.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <3CC51A1F.7040908@goingware.com> <3CC54679.FE036A82@cern.ch>
Subject: hmmm possible gpl problem?
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:28:03 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <OE421dsDb7xBNWep4CM000013c7@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2002 14:28:04.0723 (UTC) FILETIME=[14928430:01C1EAD3]

okay  - i dont claim to know anything much about gpl ...
but - http://www.tux.org/pub/security/secnet/tools/nat10/
(which is the only place I found it in a quick google search)
distributes a gpl program linked against cygwin.dll (note not cygwin1.dll)
without cygwin source.

Going on past emails, this looks faulty, but thought i would post it here
for
someone with more experience in such matters to comment.

Regards,
Gareth Pearce

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

