Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Tim Prince <tprince@computer.org>
Reply-To: tprince@computer.org
To: "J. Grant" <jg@jguk.org>, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: GNU/Windows
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 05:45:55 -0700
References: <3CBA5348.5030805@jguk.org> <20020415043615.GA1007@redhat.com> <3CBAB7EB.3090801@jguk.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CBAB7EB.3090801@jguk.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <20020415124554.D31BD2CD00@inet1.ywave.com>

On Monday 15 April 2002 04:22, J. Grant wrote:
> Hello cgf,
>
> The idea was from a conversation I had with some co-workers, not
> entirely seriously but thank you for your reply setting the facts straight.
>
> Windows has been established as a reasonable generic word IMO, with the
> Lindows case this was hinted at reciently.
>
> JG
Unlike Lindows, cygwin doesn't require a lawsuit from Microsoft to establish 
credibility, while a greater level of tolerance from Microsoft would be a 
significant advantage.
-- 
Tim Prince

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/