Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 00:44:42 -0400 From: Alan Dobkin To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ps command - revisited Message-ID: <3132867805.1018399481@ADobkin-1.US.Nortel.Com> In-Reply-To: <20020410042332.GA14199@redhat.com> References: <20020410042332.GA14199@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --On Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:23 AM -0400 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:59:08PM -0400, Alan Dobkin wrote: >> I don't intend to submit a patch for this either, at least not >> any time soon, but I would be happy to provide information and >> testing for someone else who is willing and able to work on it. > > I presume that you aren't talking to me, but I'll make it clear > one more time: I'm not interested in this in any way. Correct - I was just making an open statement to anyone on the list. Actually, I'm not that interested in it either, since I mainly use ps to list Cygwin-specific processes and TLIST for Win32 processes. > If I wanted to debug it, I'd look at the source and figure it out from > there. Voluminous details about behavior when you do/don't login via > ssh are probably not required if you are actually debugging the problem. Well, I thought ancillary information and testing results would be useful to supplement the debugging, but all the better if it's not. Alan -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/