Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com From: Richard Hitt To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: stacktrace from withn an exec upon error condition Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:46:52 -0800 Reply-To: rbh00@earthlink.net Message-ID: References: <20020328153930.GF11781@redhat.com> <20020328221751.GK16757@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20020328221751.GK16757@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g2T2eGX13262 Is it unreasonable to find appalling the suggestion to use an undocumented function? Richard On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:17:51 -0500, you wrote: >On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:44:27AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote: >>where does cygwin_stackdump() live? >>I searched through the entire cygwin inst tree, but couldn't find any header >>where it is defined. >> >>If it is a function I just invoke, where does it write the trace dump to? >>stdout? stderr? > >I suggest that you write a simple test file and run it. That would >probably answer all of your questions. > >cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/