Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:12:12 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Setting and using a password in W98 Message-ID: <20020311171212.GA17611@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <001301c1c90d$00d1ecc0$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001301c1c90d$00d1ecc0$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:57:02PM -0000, fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net wrote: >Q3. Could the contents of c:\Cygwin\cygwin.bat be "officially" tweaked >to c:\Cygwin\bin\login in order to gain the password-protection that is >not conferred by the current contents of c:\Cygwin\cygwin.bat, or would >this change simply induce other, different, equally bad consequences?! We're not going to be modifying cygwin.bat. The reasons have been mentioned in other messages in this thread. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/