Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:45:47 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [BUG] NetInstaller leaves bad dates Message-ID: <20020305154547.GD27449@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <3C8414CC.7080305@cox.net> <011f01c1c418$b6f84e30$d700a8c0@mchasecompaq> <3C84D381.2070104@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C84D381.2070104@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:17:37AM -0500, David A. Cobb wrote: >Michael A Chase wrote: >>----- Original Message ----- >>>Win98se (4.10.2222), Fat32fs with multiple PMagic partitions >>>Cygwin Netinstall 2.125.2.10 >>>Xemacs Netinstall 1.2.2.1.2.7 ( ! Wow ! ) >>>Lillypond Netinstall 2.96.jcn1 >>> >>>With that much variation, I suspect the common point-of-failure may be >>>Cygwin TAR 1.13.19-1 >> >>Setup.exe (Cygwin's install tool) has its own methods for extracting from >>compressed tar files; it does not use tar, gunzip, or bunzip2. >> >>The problem is more likely a system configuration issue. >> >Does it not, however, use "library" code snatched from those >applications? I'd hate to think Chris and the others re-invented all >those wheels. It does not use "library" code from tar. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/