Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 08:36:28 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: status gcc-3
Message-ID: <20020301133628.GC895@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <3C7F5E8A.8050507@users.sourceforge.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C7F5E8A.8050507@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 01:57:14PM +0300, Ildar Mulyukov wrote:
>		Hello, cygwin hackers!
>Would you please inform me about gcc-3.x status regarding to Cygwin 
>project? I mean
>
>* status of gcc-3 ability at cygwin platform
>	(I suggest 99%; when I tried it out 2month ago everything seemed to be 
>allright except spec - it was ugly)
>
>* plans of using it as the default/alternative compiler available via 
>setup.exe

No plans.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/