Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <ADF57C3C368ED411803C00508BCDF1A559C85E@cddkmail.cph.magnus.local>
From: Peter Ring <pri@magnus.dk>
To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: ghostscript-6.51-3
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:34:15 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"

Please forgive a silly question.

I've rebuild the previous release (ghostscript-6.51-1) with X support
(mainly for use with xdvik in order to view dvi's with postscript 
illustrations).

While this were not a major hassle (just patch src/unix-gcc.mak a little, 
don't forget to set XLIBS=Xt SM ICE Xext X11), are there any reason not 
to release X-enabled binaries for ghostscript? Will gs then not run 
without the X runtime libraries?

Kind regards
Peter Ring


-----Original Message-----
From: Dario Alcocer [mailto:alcocer@helixdigital.com]
Sent: 19. februar 2002 22:45
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: ghostscript-6.51-3


The Ghostscript package has been updated to fix a bug reported by
Greg Bond related to operation on text-mode mounts:

    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-12/msg00400.html

This release of Ghostscript is an "X-less" version (i.e. one that
doesn't require X11), and so can be used without the cygwin-xfree
packages.  The GNU 'standard' and 'other' Ghostscript font collections
are included for convenience.
<snip>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/