Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <024c01c1b1af$2e064300$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020206082639.00a9eb48@pop3.cris.com> <00e801c1b13d$6fe38e30$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <20020209184309.GN25500@redhat.com> Subject: Re: /dev/registry Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:17:28 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2002 21:16:58.0077 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B6F80D0:01C1B1AF] === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" To: > >Yah. I've been quite on this one. I'd like to point out that Cygwin > >has had a patch for /dev/registry some time ago. > > I just did a search and I can't see any formal submittal of a patch. > > Was this your patch? I seem to find some reference to this in a > "work in progress" version of your UMSDOS stuff. Not mine. And it was never submitted formally. Someone had it floating on a webpage someone where. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/