Subject: Re: FAQ topic "What about special DOS devices"
From: "Michael A Chase" <[email-masked]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>
Cc: "David Starks-Browning" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:07:11 -0800

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Collins" <[email-masked]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 16:59
Subject: Re: FAQ topic "What about special DOS devices"

>
> ===
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Collins" <[email-masked]>
> To: <[email-masked]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 11:58 AM
> Subject: FAQ topic "What about special DOS devices"
>
>
> > Can we add "(i.e. comX, lptX, aux)"
>
>                                      ^ to the title of the question

I think that would confuse the people that don't already know about the
problem.  "com1, com2, lpt1, aux" are more concrete and are more likely to
be found by a search.

--
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/