Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <029a01c1a63e$bc737170$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
To: "egor duda" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <002401c1a3f4$0b77e8c0$010310ac@lyoncleitienne> <20020123120701.A11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> <8181418335.20020124161420@logos-m.ru> <20020124142156.Y11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> <4183271981.20020124164513@logos-m.ru> <20020124163840.B11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20020124170147.D11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> <4192451650.20020124191813@logos-m.ru>
Subject: Re: Descriptor passing between process
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 18:54:51 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2002 07:54:49.0551 (UTC) FILETIME=[BAD0BDF0:01C1A63E]


===
----- Original Message -----
From: "egor duda" <deo@logos-m.ru>
To: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: Descriptor passing between process


> Hi!
>
> Thursday, 24 January, 2002 Corinna Vinschen cygwin@cygwin.com wrote:
>
> CV> It *could* be implemented.
>
> CV> First we would have to implement the control message passing at
all and
> CV> when it's available we could perhaps even implement descriptor
passing
> CV> using the DuplicateHandle() function.
>
> To call DuplicateHandle() you must have a process handle of the peer.
> i don't know how can we do it properly without cygwin daemon.


Egor, we can have the daemon when someone submits a critical review of
the implementation, with a summary of

"Completely broken"
"Good, but X should be done before merging to HEAD"
"Looks good, work in progress as everything is, but I'd be happy with it
in HEAD".

AFAICT Chris is looking for someone to actually read the code and say
what they think. If it's bad it tells me what to fix, if it's good, then
we get the daemon.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

