Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 19:18:13 +0300 From: egor duda X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53 RC/4) Reply-To: egor duda Organization: deo X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <4192451650.20020124191813@logos-m.ru> To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: Descriptor passing between process In-Reply-To: <20020124170147.D11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <002401c1a3f4$0b77e8c0$010310ac@lyoncleitienne> <20020123120701.A11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> <8181418335.20020124161420@logos-m.ru> <20020124142156.Y11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> <4183271981.20020124164513@logos-m.ru> <20020124163840.B11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20020124170147.D11608@cygbert.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Thursday, 24 January, 2002 Corinna Vinschen cygwin@cygwin.com wrote: CV> It *could* be implemented. CV> First we would have to implement the control message passing at all and CV> when it's available we could perhaps even implement descriptor passing CV> using the DuplicateHandle() function. To call DuplicateHandle() you must have a process handle of the peer. i don't know how can we do it properly without cygwin daemon. btw, i wonder if descriptor sent through AF_LOCAL socket whould remain valid after sender closes it? and what about "after sender terminates"? Egor. mailto:deo@logos-m.ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/