Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:07:19 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ksh on cygwin Message-ID: <20020110160719.GB24820@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <200201101551.g0AFp8d03682@dymwsm09.mailwatch.com> <20020110170326.R12057@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020110170326.R12057@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:03:26PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> , so I've rewritten the code from memory after looking at the sources. >> The differences are substancial, so no problem here either. > >I think that's ok. "Rewritten" should be enough. IANAL, IANAL, ... If you've actually looked at the UWIN sources, this is not enough. IANAL either, but I believe that this means you've been tainted. That means that we can't use your patches. Sorry. I hope I am misinterpreting what you said incorrectly... cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/