Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:05:19 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: ksh on cygwin Message-ID: <20020110160519.GA24820@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <200201101259.g0ACxFN12728@dymwsm10.mailwatch.com> <20020110144551.J12057@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020110144551.J12057@cygbert.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:45:51PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> Is it OK to send patches to 1.3.3-2 or should I move them to 1.3.6 first? > >I would suggest to move them to the latest from CVS. If you're >always working against the latest from CVS you don't get hit too >much by changes from other people. Yes. This is a requirement. Latest CVS. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/