Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:13:51 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: sources.redhat.com alias for sources.redhat.com going away
Message-ID: <20020104171351.GE30445@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <6EB31774D39507408D04392F40A10B2BACC8CD@FDYEXC202.mgroupnet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6EB31774D39507408D04392F40A10B2BACC8CD@FDYEXC202.mgroupnet.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:18:57AM -0500, Roth, Kevin P. wrote:
>What about cygwin.com? Is that a more-or-less permanent alias for
>sources.redhat.com? I've always wondered why you always referred to the
>redhat address, when the cygwin one seems to be used more (it appears
>you sent your announcement to cyg-ann@cygwin.com for instance), and is
>more specific to the project, and besides, it's shorter...

Who's "always" referring to the redhat address?  Most (all?) of my email
refers to cygwin.com.  The announcement *itself* used cygwin.com as the
return address.com.  The help at the bottom of every message refers to
cygwin.com.  The messages that I send to cygwin-announce mention
cygwin.com.

The cygwin.com alias for sources.redhat.com has nothing to do with
"sourceware.cygnus.com".

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/