Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:04:51 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: Cygwin Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected Message-ID: <20020102110451.F27340@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: Corinna Vinschen , Cygwin References: <20020101160631.B27340@cygbert.vinschen.de> <002501c19320$0fb94080$865c07d5@BRAMSCHE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002501c19320$0fb94080$865c07d5@BRAMSCHE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:57:25AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > Thanks for this hints. While porting kdelibs I have had to explicity closed and delete the > socket file before I can bound to it (which wasn't used under other ported os) and as I found > the decribed code in the bind() function, the first thoughts was that this may be the > problem. After this correction I will look at the kde code to identify the called functions. > Perhaps the problem is the getsockname(). I have checked in a fix to getsockname() to return the correct result for AF_LOCAL/AF_UNIX sockets as well. You can find it in the current sources from CVS. > After looking in the code I have an additional question. Does cygwin and linux differs in the > possibilites of deleting of open files ? This could be a difference, because I have found > that before binding an unlink() is made, but fails. The usual Win32/Posix difference: You can't unlink a file on Win32 which is still in use. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/