Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 14:12:32 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected Message-ID: <20011231191232.GA2796@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <20011231171737.GC1801@redhat.com> <000b01c1922d$3f42ca90$865c07d5@BRAMSCHE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000b01c1922d$3f42ca90$865c07d5@BRAMSCHE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:59:15PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> Why would you infer that? You ran 'nm' over cygdll.a. Does that mean that all of the >> symbols from cygdll.a were part of libpthread.a? >> >No, only the symbols, which are defined in pthread.o, called the "reflib" in speclib. And why couldn't you do the same thing with cygwin.din? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/