Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011204131715.027956b8@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender: rrschulz@pop3.cris.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 13:18:42 -0800
To: cygwin@cygwin.com, cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz@cris.com>
Subject: Re: Speaking of debian cygwin
In-Reply-To: <3C0D2982.1000503@ece.gatech.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Charles,

Are they so upset they got the article pulled? All I get, beyond the 
Slahsdot page adornments, is this:

         "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

Has this article been pulled, or is there an error in the URL you gave?

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 11:52 2001-12-04, Charles Wilson wrote:
>There's another slashdot article:
>
>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/04/13552388
>
>Seems the debian-devel folks aren't too happy about this...
>
>--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/