Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:06:00 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com, cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Speaking of debian cygwin Message-ID: <20011204210600.GG19946@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com References: <3C0D2982.1000503@ece.gatech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C0D2982.1000503@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 02:52:34PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >There's another slashdot article: > >http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/04/13552388 > >Seems the debian-devel folks aren't too happy about this... I'm surprised that this has actually finally happened. This has been in discussion for *years*. I've been subscribed to the mailing list which discusses debian for win32 and it has gone through the standard ebbs and flows of a project that was apparently going nowhere. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/