Subject: Re: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils
From: Jason Tishler <[email-masked]>
To: Charles Wilson <[email-masked]>
Cc: Horak Daniel <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 07:49:33 -0500

Chuck,

[Sorry for the sluggish response time...]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:41:04PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Horak Daniel wrote:
> 
> > > What does postgresql do if there is no system-wide union semun?
> > 
> > There is a check for union semun in configure and then if it does not
> > find a system wide union semun it defines its own as
> > 
> > [snip]
> Ah, then cygipc-1.11 won't work for postgresql.  Cygwin (and Linux) 
> implementations of IPC need a fourth union memeber,
> [snip]
> This sounds like a vote for 'return to 1.10 behavior'.  Any other comments?

I just tried the simplistic approach: configure, make, make check.
PostgreSQL 7.1.3 builds cleanly and passes all regression tests.  So it
seems that cygipc 1.11 is still compatible with PostgreSQL.

Thanks,
Jason

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/