Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <3C052AC5.1090905@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:19:49 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Horak Daniel CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Horak Daniel wrote: >> >>1) postgresql folks: does this work for you? >> > > PostgreSQL has a check for existence of union semun and can live without > system-wide union semun. Okay, but that brings us back to the thing that I don't understand: if there is no system-wide union semun, then application code MUST define it exactly the way the underlying library wants (which says to me, it ought to BE in the library's header...) What does postgresql do if there is no system-wide union semun? --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/