Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Subject: RE: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:40:33 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils Thread-Index: AcF3Bgmh/oepvoURQU+mqik2f74PLABJUoVQ From: =?US-ASCII?Q?Horak_Daniel?= To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id fASGjZR23885 > So, did I do the right thing? Should I try to match SUSv2 or Linux? > Also, I have some concerns about passing a union as a > variable arg...can > you really DO that? I mean, it compiles and all, and SEEMS > to work, but... > > Questions: > > 1) postgresql folks: does this work for you? PostgreSQL has a check for existence of union semun and can live without system-wide union semun. > > 2) should I go back to Linux style (define union semun in sem.h, > require four args on semctl()) Dan -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/