Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 12:55:53 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: new site for my ports is up Message-ID: <20011117175553.GA23825@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <017d01c16f26$f05cf9b0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <20011117172920.GA23168@redhat.com> <20011117173257.GB23168@redhat.com> <3BF6A2A0.5030507@ece.gatech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BF6A2A0.5030507@ece.gatech.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 12:47:12PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>>No. No multiple packages in the same directory. Every package gets >>>their own directory. >>> >> >>Just to clarify: By "no multiple packages", I mean that I don't want to >>see (to pick an extreme example) ash-blah.tar.bz2 and >>binutils-blah-tar.bz2 in an ash+binutils directory. > >But subdirs are okay -- and already work. E.g.: > >latest/ncurses/ncurses*.tar.bz2 >latest/ncurses/setup.hint (for the ncurses package) >latest/ncurses/libncurses5/libncurses5*.tar.bz2 >latest/ncurses/libncurses5/setup.hint (for the libncurses5 package) >latest/ncurses/libncurses6/libncurses6*.tar.bz2 >latest/ncurses/libncurses6/setup.hint (for the libncurses6 package) > >BUT, everything under latest/ncurses/ is directly related to ncurses itself. One additional level of subdirs are ok. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/