Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Gareth Pearce" , References: Subject: Re: no more package moratorium? Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 18:29:33 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2001 07:36:43.0248 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B2C4F00:01C16CDF] That seems a reasonable thing to me. It does raise an interesting point: who, when, and how, do new packages get approved? (I don't mean the physical quality of the packaging either :}). Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gareth Pearce" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:25 AM Subject: no more package moratorium? > > subject asks the question... I gathered that the release of new setup was > going to bring the moratorium down ... if so I might start considering > packaging up nano, assuming I can work out how to patch it consistantly... > > so umm anyone want to give an answer? > > Gareth > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/