Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: setup test #4
From: Robert Collins <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <20011102004118.A26951@redhat.com>
References: <1004677947.5402.98.camel@lifelesswks>
	<20011102001943.A26768@redhat.com> <1004678683.5402.104.camel@lifelesswks>
	<20011102002907.B26768@redhat.com> <1004679576.5558.113.camel@lifelesswks> 
	<20011102004118.A26951@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 02 Nov 2001 16:45:32 +1100
Message-Id: <1004679933.5367.117.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:41, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:39:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:24:42PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> >>>The long term goal for source downloads is to let them be selected
> >> >>>separately from the binaries, either as separate source packages, or as
> >> >>>a completely independent spin control where the current src box it.
> >> >>
> >> >>Yay!
> >> >
> >> >Now, if only someone would code this.
> >> 
> >> The separate source packages should be relatively easy.  They could
> >> just be another package, right?  So you'd see something like:
> >> 
> >> cygwin-1.3.3-1
> >> cygwin-1.3.3-1-src
> >> 
> >> I guess you could have a separate "Source" category, too, although
> >> that would complicate setup.ini parsing a bit.
> >
> >That part wouldn't, you'd simply put the package into the Source
> >category.

          ^programmatically^.
 Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/