Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 00:29:07 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: setup test #4 Message-ID: <20011102002907.B26768@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <1004677947.5402.98.camel@lifelesswks> <20011102001943.A26768@redhat.com> <1004678683.5402.104.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1004678683.5402.104.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:24:42PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:19, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>The long term goal for source downloads is to let them be selected >>>separately from the binaries, either as separate source packages, or as >>>a completely independent spin control where the current src box it. >> >>Yay! > >Now, if only someone would code this. The separate source packages should be relatively easy. They could just be another package, right? So you'd see something like: cygwin-1.3.3-1 cygwin-1.3.3-1-src I guess you could have a separate "Source" category, too, although that would complicate setup.ini parsing a bit. You could also have something like a "View Source" button which toggles whether source was selected or not although that might just be too many buttons... cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/