Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Re[2]: setup testers wanted From: Robert Collins To: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: <20011101205025.A6760@redhat.com> References: <1004622067.3342.30.camel@lifelesswks> <1381809501.20011101100915@earthlink.net> <1004657351.4644.7.camel@lifelesswks> <1004658066.4644.15.camel@lifelesswks> <7825503011.20011101164409@earthlink.net> <1004663375.5083.12.camel@lifelesswks> <20011101205025.A6760@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Nov 2001 14:57:03 +1100 Message-Id: <1004673424.5367.66.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2001 04:01:19.0369 (UTC) FILETIME=[06FBDF90:01C16353] On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 12:50, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:09:34PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >How about we get rid of either 'skip' or 'keep' - they are the same > >AFAIK. > > We had this discussion in cygwin-developers. They are subtly different. > One implies that the package exists on disk and you'll be keeping it. > The other implies that you will not be installing the package. Sure, but will users grok this? Hmm, maybe we shouldn't show skip for non installed packages? Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/